Skip to Content
EMPIRICAL EVALUATION · EFFICACY STUDIES

Prove What Works in L&D.

What measurable impact does your training, leadership curriculum, or organizational intervention deliver on the job? We replace superficial post-seminar smile sheets with rigorous empirical evidence: combining validated psychometric scales, cognitive behavioral paradigms, longitudinal pre/post designs, and a boardroom-ready Impact Dossier.

Prove L&D Impact · Empirical Evaluation & Efficacy Studies
Dr. rer. medic. Franz Hütter · BRAIN-HR Research Lab Cohen's d · Hedges' g · RCT
METHODOLOGY
5-Stage Spectrum + Meta-Analysis

Pre/post, follow-up, control group & RCT

INSTRUMENTS
14+ Scales & Cognitive Tasks

Validated surveys + Stroop, Flanker, N-Back

DELIVERABLE
Executive Impact Dossier

Effect sizes (d / g), p-values & recommendations

INFRASTRUCTURE & GDPR
Dedicated EU Study Platform

Anonymous participant codes · DPA available upfront

TWO PATHS TO EMPIRICAL PROOF

Commissioned Full-Service Study or Guided In-House Research.

Depending on whether you require an independent external impact audit for your executive board and enterprise clients, or want to build internal evaluation capability:

PATH A · DONE-FOR-YOU COMMISSIONED STUDY

Independent Efficacy Study by BRAIN-HR

We take full responsibility for your research mandate: from study design and hosting on our GDPR-compliant platform to statistical modeling and the final Executive Impact Report.

  • Custom research design (pre/post, longitudinal follow-up, control group) tailored to your sample size
  • Turnkey data collection via our EU study platform (validated questionnaires + cognitive tasks)
  • Complete statistical modeling (effect sizes, confidence intervals, moderation analyses)
  • Citation-ready Impact Report + executive presentation for your board, procurement, or clients
Scope Your Study in a 25-Min Call →
PATH B · DONE-WITH-YOU (MASTERCLASS)

Conduct Your Own Study in the Research Masterclass (16 Weeks)

Lead your own empirical evaluation or research project under the academic supervision of Dr. Franz Hütter, including full access to our evaluation infrastructure.

  • 16-week structured research track in an intimate cohort (max. 8 participants)
  • 14+ pre-configured, scientifically validated psychometric scales ready to deploy
  • Weekly live supervision covering study design, sampling, statistics, and interpretation
  • Fixed tuition: €2,950 net · Graduate with your own publishable impact report
Explore the Research Masterclass (€2,950) →
METHODOLOGICAL RIGOR

Five Stages of Impact Evaluation Plus Meta-Analysis.

Not every program requires a randomized controlled trial on day one. Together, we select the methodological stage that delivers maximum statistical power for your cohort size and budget.

STAGE 1 · BASELINE

Post-Intervention Cross-Section

How is the program received, and how concrete is behavioral transfer intent?

Measured post-training using validated transfer and utility scales rather than superficial smile sheets. Ideal from N ≥ 15 participants as an immediate diagnostic benchmark.

STAGE 2 · PRACTICE STANDARD

Pre-Post Measurement (Before / After)

What measurably changed in participants' knowledge, attitudes, or behavior?

Paired measurement before and after the intervention via anonymous participant codes. Delivers true statistical effect sizes (Cohen's d) for individual capability gains.

STAGE 3 · SUSTAINABILITY

Pre-Post with 6–12 Week Longitudinal Follow-Up

Does the effect hold up under everyday workplace pressure or fade after week one?

Three measurement waves (T0 baseline, T1 post-training, T2 workplace follow-up). Separates short-lived seminar euphoria from durable on-the-job behavior change.

STAGE 4 · CAUSAL ATTRIBUTION

Control-Group Design (Quasi-Experimental)

Is the observed improvement genuinely caused by your training or by external trends?

Compares the intervention cohort against an untreated comparison group or waitlist cohort, isolating the net causal effect of your L&D investment.

STAGE 5 · GOLD STANDARD

Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

What is the publication-grade, causally unassailable proof of efficacy?

Random allocation to intervention and control conditions. Maximum scientific rigor for flagship academies, institutional accreditations, and peer-reviewed publications.

CROSS-STUDY · SYNTHESIS

Systematic Literature Review & Meta-Analysis

What does the global body of empirical evidence say about your method or domain?

Pooled effect sizes (Hedges' g), forest plots, moderator analyses, and publication-bias diagnostics: building an unassailable scientific foundation for your product positioning.

STUDY PLATFORM · OBJECTIVE & SUBJECTIVE METRICS

Beyond Self-Reports: Browser-Based Cognitive & Behavioral Paradigms.

Self-report surveys alone are vulnerable to social desirability bias. On our proprietary study platform, we combine validated psychometric scales with objective millisecond reaction-time and executive-function paradigms.

STROOP PARADIGM

Inhibitory Control & Interference

Measures with millisecond precision how effectively participants suppress automatic responses in favor of task-relevant processing.

FLANKER TASK

Selective Executive Attention

Assesses the ability to filter out competing distractor stimuli and sustain focused attentional control.

N-BACK PARADIGM

Working Memory Updating

Evaluates continuous monitoring, updating, and manipulation of information in working memory under cognitive load.

GDPR Compliance & Data Processing Agreement (DPA)

All studies are hosted on dedicated European infrastructure. Longitudinal waves are linked via participant-generated anonymous codes, preventing employer identification of individual respondents. You can download our Data Processing Agreement (DPA) upfront for your legal and compliance review.

EMPIRICAL CASE STUDIES

Three Real-World Evaluation Studies from Our Practice.

Corporate negotiation training
PRE-POST-FOLLOW-UP · N = 164

Corporate Negotiation Training (N = 164)

Longitudinal evaluation tracking 164 participants across multiple waves: measuring negotiation capability, self-efficacy, and on-the-job transfer moderated by daily workload. Beyond significant skill gains, the study pinpointed the exact organizational boundary conditions that accelerate or inhibit workplace transfer.

Cognitive behavioral testing
COGNITIVE PARADIGMS + PSYCHOMETRICS

Neurocognitive Effects of an Intervention

Combined validated stress questionnaires with objective cognitive paradigms (Stroop, Flanker, N-Back) before, immediately after, and eight weeks post-intervention, demonstrating measurable improvements in executive attentional control alongside subjective well-being.

VR-assisted intervention
SUBJECTIVE & OBJECTIVE METRICS

Efficacy Audit of a VR Learning Environment

Empirical evaluation of a Virtual Reality training format compared against conventional instruction: assessing immersive presence, cognitive load, and objective skill retention to guide a corporate academy's capital investment decision.

TANGIBLE DELIVERABLES

From Diagnostic Scoping Call to Citation-Ready Impact Report.

1. Tailored Research Design

Selection of the optimal evaluation stage (Stages 1–5), statistical power & sample planning, validated scale selection, and timeline.

2. Turnkey Online Data Collection

Full setup of questionnaires and cognitive paradigms on our EU study platform, including invitation links, QR codes, and anonymous longitudinal matching.

3. Publication-Grade Statistical Analysis

Computation of effect sizes (Cohen's d, Hedges' g), hypothesis tests, scale reliability (Cronbach's α / McDonald's ω), and moderator analyses.

4. Executive Impact Dossier & Boardroom Briefing

Comprehensive written report (Executive Summary, visual charts, methodology appendix, concrete curriculum recommendations) plus live debriefing.

Ready to Prove the Impact of Your Program?

In a focused 25-minute diagnostic call, we review your program, sample size, and the optimal evaluation design directly with Dr. Franz Hütter.

Schedule Your 25-Minute Diagnostic Call →